Thursday, September 02, 2010
Members Minimize

Chair:
Jon Spelde, GROWMARK, Inc.


Richard Bramhill, Dow AgroSciences
Cindy Camacci, DuPont Crop Protection
Damian Eldred, Wilbur-Ellis Company
Greg Erler, Monsanto Company
Bill Manwarren, Winfield Solutions
Richard Penhale, Crop Production Services
John Reichle, Bayer CropScience    
Vickie Smith, Helena Chemical
Cory Jones, Syngenta Seed             
Brett Randol, Rosen's

Non-voting Members:
Tyler Pickel, Wilbur Ellis
Rod Conner, AgGateway
Wendy Smith, AgGateway

Project Coordinator:
Marilyn Hunter, AgGateway

Documents Minimize
Product Cost Information (PCI) Project Minimize

At one time, it was sufficient for selling companies to update and publish their product cost catalogs once a year for their buyers – distributors, dealers and retailers. Not any more. Increased geographic diversity and complexity of product cost information, coupled with the dynamic landscape of the Crop Protection, Turf and Ornamental and Seed industries, requires many updates throughout the season.

For buyers, interpreting and keying complex data into multiple business applications creates a higher risk for errors and intensive manual labor. The Product Cost Information (PCI) initiative addresses the need for sellers to electronically deliver the most up‐to‐date cost information to buyers throughout the season, timely, securely and accurately.Companies that have committed to Phase 1: Bayer CropScience, BASF Corporation, Crop Production Services, Dow AgroSciences, DuPont Crop Protection, GROWMARK, Inc., Helena Chemical, Monsanto Company, Rosen's, Inc., Syngenta Seed, Winfield Solutions and Wilbur-Ellis Company.

Updates:

This project is scheduled for two phases (design & implementation).  We have completed Phase 1 design portion of the project.  BASF, Bayer CropScience, Crop Production Services, Dow AgroSciences, DuPont Crop Protection, GROWMARK, Monsanto Company, Syngenta Crop Protection, Winfield Solutions and Wilbur-Ellis Company are committed to Phase 2- the implementation portion of the project.   At the CCP meeting in Indianapolis, the implementation schedule was determined, with the next step of working on development.

Copyright 2010 AgGateway Terms Of UsePrivacy Statement